AM I THE ONLY ONE IN AMERICA WHO THINKS THAT ALL THE CANDIDATES ARE FULL OF CRAP? THERE ARE A LOT OF JERKS OUT THERE WHO ARE BUYING INTO WHAT THEY “SAY”.
SAYING means nothing.
My credentials in the black community are solid, so I don’t want to hear any garbage about me being prejudice against Obama. He just happens to be the one giving the best example of what I am talking about. He gives great speeches….he’s winning the war of words….the promises to force “change” and “give hope”, without any substantive proof that he has any ability to actually do it. STOP IT! HIS TALK DON’T MEAN SHIT!—-
It’s all talk. There is not a single substantive thing in his past; in his present, or in his future,which lends any creditibliy to thinking that he can accomplish any of the things he is talking about. Stop being swayed by talk.
Are we still electing people because they are good talkers? The hell with talking. The hell with “hope” and “change”. I’ve been hearing it since Dewey vs Truman. Tom Dewey was a famous DA (with more ties to organized crime than the Sopranos—my uncle was a detective in his office). Dewey allowed a mob “rat” to be thrown out a hotel by the detectives who were supposed to be body-guarding him before he mob trial.
Every single presidential campaign I have witnessed since the forties, had the phrases “We need change in Washington”; “I can provide hope” After 60 years of hearing about “hope” and “change” and yet, seeing niether of them….I’ve arrived at the point that it is all pure political bullshit.
We in America suffer a mental disability of believing that these guys really care about hope and change….What they REALLY care about is getting elected by promising idiots like you that they will create hope and fulfill your longings for change. No candidate in my 71 years has ever accomplished either.
The nut-jobs among us (and that means you) are always interested in IMAGE, not, SUBSTANCE. Let me remind you again…I am only jumping on Obama because he is the one that you people are flocking to, based on unsubstantiated, WORDS AND PROMISES. Words don’t feed the bulldog!
I don’t blame any of these guys and (girl) for trying to pull it it off on us; but I blame those of you who are buying this bullshit and using criteria of “LIKABLE” “WHAT A SPEAKER”, etc.
LIKABLE SPEECH-MAKERS MEAN NOTHING…..NOTHING!
WC Fields was right….didn’t he say, “There’s a sucker born every minute”? Or was it someone else? Whoever said it, was absolutely right! And then came Vance Packard…who wrote
“The Hidden Persuaders”—-where-in he proved how stupid, gullable, and real ass-holes the american public is when it comes to being influenced by advertising words, and promises by commercials, etc. etc.. my favorite examples is the study he did with regard to laundry detergent. He put the same detergent in a drab ugly brown box and in a bright, yellow and blue box…he told them to use the detergent….90% said that the detergent in the bright yellow and blue box was so, so, so much better than the detergent in the ugly brown box…
THEY DIDN’T KNOW IT WAS THE SAME FREAKIN’ DETERGENT IN BOTH BOXES.
They were fooled by the pretty image of the box it came in.
WE DO THE SAME THING WITH CANDIDATES…POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS ARE NOTHING BUT SEEMINGLY NEVER ENDING COMMERCIALS.
The Clinton’s are not likable, for more reasons than the number of “pipe-jobs” Monica gave to her lovers. But, likable or not….if indeed Bill’s 8 years in office produced the best results for this country in the last half decade, as some say…that means that the Clinton’s have tons more substance for running a country than we could ever expect of a young, attractive, hopeful Barack Obama, who has yet to prove anything….except using some bad judgment about a guy who has just been indicted in Chicago. (see further down in blog)
In the debate between Nixon and Kennedy, Nixon was much more substantive than Kennedy, and did many more substanstive things than Kennedy ever did….but Kennedy was much more “likable”, so he won.
Likability is so much easier to measure than substance is…so, Americans, who love to make life easy, ichoose image over substance every time. HOW FREAKIN’ DUMB IS THAT!
Remember about a month ago I warned you all to avoid the Rudy bankwagon…because his real of lack of substance in his New York life would show him to be “a nothing” Well, I told ya so”. His judgment and wrong decision making (like “Bernie Kerik”) proved that. Kerik goes to jail…and Rudy butt kisses McCain now so he will get some kind of 9/11 related national position.
Let’s take a look at Mr. Obama….good words, good looks, great speaker…hell of a dancer….but, where’s the beef? Well, take a look at this beef. Hillary mentioned that he has been directly tied to Tony Rezko, a prince of darkness in Chicago. Hillary was derided for mentioning it druing the debate…yet, 5 days later, the New York Post clues us in “The feds arrested Tony Rezko, political fund-raiser and backer of Barack Obama. His 2 million dollar bail revoked for his fraud, money-laundering and additional indictments. This is a bad, bad guy.
And make no mistake about it…Obama had full knowledge of what this guy was. In fact, he was on the inside of what this guy was doing; by fronting for him in some of the deals that he is now charged with. Barack was helping him do it. Barack actually got a nice deal on a home and land as a pay-back, according to justice department sources. Lawyers know everything about their big clients. Obama either DID know, or SHOULD have known…either way it was an example of a lack of judgment, and wrong decision-making.
NOW THAT’S SOMETHING SUBSTANTIVE WHEN IT COMES TO JUDGING OBAMA. His words about “Hope”and “Change” are diminished by the reality of facts.
And how about this well known phrase….”show me who your friends are, and I’ll show you what YOU are”. Ted Kennedy;
freakin’ Ted “I-could-swim-and-she-couldn’t” Kennedy is endorsing him. Now there is a friend whom you need on your side. An unabashed, untreated drunk, who literally allowed a woman to die a horrible death….and….tomorrow I will give you the REAL, unknown story of what really happend between Ted and Mary-Joe that night. I’ll give just a taste now, …but be sure to back tomorrow for the main meal…
Jack Caufield and Tony Ulazowitz, were two detectives I worked with in the Bureau Of Special Services. They were big shots at the time,and I was a “little shit”. Tony and Jack always got the Nixon body guarding assignment when he visited NY. After Nixon got elected, he offered Jack and Tony jobs in DC. Jack became head of DEA (G. Gordon Liddy was his legal advisor)….and Tony worked under Jack. As soon as the Kennedy and Mary-Jo event happened, Nixon sent Jack and Tony to Martha’s Vineyard to get the story. Kennedy was getting ready to challenge Nixon’s re-election. Jack and Tony posed as newspaper reporters with phony press credentials, etc. That’s enough for now. Come back tomorrow for what really “went down” that night. Not as many things “went down” as you think. In a real sense Ted “killed” Mary-Jo
DON’T FORGET THE MAIN LESSON TODAY….NEVER ELECT A PERSON BECAUSE THEY ARE “LIKABLE”….NEVER!